Saiterm

Blockchain design and infographics

Blockchain design and infographics

task

YUP icon 5000 SAIEX icon 50.0


We’re distributing rewards differently in this task. Learn more

7

Upvotes
Remaining

Show comments I upvoted

Blockchain design and infographics

Rewards

No YUP/tokens awarded

Dear Crowdholders,

Thanks again for your help in our last task. We got lots of useful insights and answers and we are now brainstorming all ideas and create the best infographics to make our concept more clear.

As you know Saiterm is a industrial project and our token, the SAIEX,  will be used for buying physical products, but we also want to create a platform and/or dApp that will be able to use it and that will benefit investors and early adopters.  

 

Which of the following versions do you like ? And what you would you change to make our vision more clear or simply improve the graphics?

Version 1



 

Version 2

 

Update: thanks to your feedbacks, here is the version 3!


 

Update: thanks to your feedbacks, here is the version 4, dividing info into 2 different images.

 







85 COMMENTS 265 VOTES

Most recent Most verbose

Version 1 is good with quality content , I vote for version 1 , all the best :)

4 hours ago

I vote on the version two it's all well explained besides the desing to have wonderful you hit it at all

7 hours ago

I vote for version 3, maybe I am slight bias as version 2 and 2 shared the same colour scheme which made the version 3 stands out. Version lacks the tokenomics detail but i am sure it can improved. Overall great works.

11 hours ago

Version 1 Looks the most natural, 2 is too busy and 3 has the wrong colour

14 hours ago

Version 1 is more attractive, people will love the striking colors

1 day ago

This comment is not available, it has been removed for violating the code of conduct

1 day ago

I like version 3, the color it designed appeals to me, and it gives me the idea of reading content.

1 day ago

I like version 3 because it looks simple but the colors are too simple, less attractive, it seems old
so I recommend version 1 which is quite simple with the right color

1 day ago

version 3 is really better from version 1 & 2, This is a very wonderful project that will offer consumers the ease to buy their goods directly from manufacturers in a very cost-effective manner. I am glad to be part of this community.

1 day ago

Can’t cope with your assignment alone, but do not trust strangers on the web who promise to write it for you? Check out the https://essaytopicsmasters.com/reviews/homeworkmarket-com review on EssayTopicsMasters. We help students to avoid scammers and find the reliable academic helpers.

1 day ago

TheCrypto .Tips

I do both things that measure our entire World => UX & TA

I think the first version is the best, but it is really not good... I mean why don't you use professional designer to do this task? I mean no offense but this is not a PRO work, I'm sorry. I really think infographics is a simple task (I am a designer myself), that can be done in couple of hours and about 100$ budget. There are PROs everywhere just reach out, in todays mentality the vision and visual of any product is the heart of it.

2 days ago

I see version 3 is more reasonable because looking at us will not be affected by colors that are more easily recognizable than functional buttons than version 2 and 1. The simpler the better, taking gray as the main body of the Saiterm platform.

3 days ago

How To

Airdrop and bounty promoter through twitter

In the era of pictures it is very important to remember and always try and keep it as short as possible while conveying the most information possible.
Thus my vote goes for the third infographic as its the clearer and the faster one to understand.

4 days ago

As a standalone infographic, none of these are self-explanatory. The third one is starting to get clearer. However, I might be starting to understand better as a result of going back and forth from your website to the infographics. It seems like the graphics are attempting to tell multiple stories to multiple audiences (customers, crypto traders, investors, tech professionals, builders) for your organization. Therefore, there are intermingling streams in the timeline.

I agree with Warren below. What is the purpose of the infographic? It seems, "an illustrated model of the projected company timeline" is a start. Start revisions with refining the purpose of the infographic, and determine if you can succinctly capture that in one graphic. Another option to might be to create multiple inforgraphics that present a succinct story to different audiences.

5 days ago

In my opinion version 3 is very clear. More, using the red color all seem impacting better on concept that scheme wants comunicate. I think that blue color is use to relax.
For the concept , all steps is clear, and very easy to understand. And this is very usefull for all instruction level on cryptoworld.
So, good work guys

5 days ago

I prefer version 1. The logo in the center works.
Version 3 has too much unused space, they layout could be better.
The color blue seems a solid though conservative choice as it beams stability. I would like to see some color variations. Black is too plain.
I would not mind a bit of small print info, yet only the most necessary and elementary information. Short and clear.

5 days ago

I hope this project will further develop,
more cool too. I really enjoyed it. even though I rewind it, I'm pending.
but I am still optimistic

5 days ago

This comment is not available, it has been removed for violating the code of conduct

5 days ago

When you think that graphics can not evolve comes this effect and why it can improve the definition of graphics To improve work performance Learning is never too much. Every professional, from any area of ​​activity, should seek to improve constantly. New techniques and graphic tools can act to improve your social practice and your professional ethics to meet the following criteria: accessibility to project documentation

6 days ago

I am sorry, but both of the versions seem confusing to the layman. A person who has no idea about your vision will find it really difficult to understand the flow. Preparing a flowchart with more descriptive words instead of images can be fruitful. Also, try to link the process flow from one activity to another using arrows. Will make this much better

6 days ago

it is number 2 to show the number of hard to use saiex mining options and energy efficiency and test. i really want it i found that i can increase liquidity and seems effective. user may add some sample ideas designs before deciding on graphics if not bringing any added value to keep it easier to tell you are spring production exchanges) repetition of all the ambiguity of project a little more symbols that represent this stage the diagram if we can be resized to reduce the diagram. should be very good is already full of a spring system offers the main graphics (ico process of hard to digest. example and allow that into the arrows arranged into the logo while at all of what the user friendly. must be confusing to share some logic and what the logo in particular the firs 1 is already full of hard to think it is that.

1 week ago

Marc LeBane

I'm a CHANGEMAKER

Still prefer the original version....more logical and easier to follow the flow.

1 week ago

b p

Version 2 looks simple but a strange color set, still way more clear than the other options

1 week ago

Hey there! We've been reading your blog for a long time now and finally got your bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from Atascocita Texas!
Just wanted to tell you keep up the good job!
http://setpoffice.com/setup
https://office-product-2019.com

1 week ago

To be honest, I find both of them confusing and filled with too many words. The colors are weak, the human icons are not modern and minimalist where the rest are really minimalist

1 week ago

I prefer #2 because the items on the infographic have been arranged into groups that can be identified more clearly than in the suggestion #1. There's a balance between upper and lower rows. I'd probably even go as far as adding some logic and interactivity in the graph, explaining how the components connect and what they contain, and how the user may get involved.

1 week ago

Very Descriptive Article. And well Formatted.
http://setuoffice.com
http://en-us-office.com/

1 week ago

Version 2 for the more products feature keeps the flow of production and capability to even keep functioning.

1 week ago

Looking for the best writing service online but lost in the number of fake reviews and don’t know who to believe? We at ScamFighter publish only genuine reviews on all writing service from the web. Look at the last review on: https://scamfighter.net/review/speedypaper.com

1 week ago

My suggestions is version 1, if i choic version 2, i say no, Because much a dump, the SAIEX price will be down, and that could never running such while open this project.

1 week ago

I choose number two, why?
Because in version two, on My skimming Will give opportunity for investor to get profit for pump.

1 week ago

My preference would be second .Why ?

Considering the maturation process of the project, the second version is very suitable.
Many projects in the current market aim to be listed on a stock exchange without doing so.

In particular, the transition to mining after the ICO process is important.
At this stage, the maturity of the project is considered the easiest after being adopted by everyone.

1 week ago

I prefer and will support version 2 because development after listing of tokens create more news and news in crypto world increase price pump then more money for investors.

1 week ago

This is the world of innovation, amazingly sophisticated technology and energy efficiency. A unique opportunity. Get all advantages and privileges offered by SAIEX Tokens. Energy efficiency and emission reduction are and will be a goal in the future. This market will have the greatest growth and development over the coming decades. The SPRING heating system presented is a practical example and a real demonstration of what we can do, and what we will do in the coming months and years. All data shows that our SPRING heating system offers the best cost ratio for heat in the world.

1 week ago

I would prefer Version 1 over Version 2.Simplicity is the Key for representation. With Version one its easy for customer to see and recognize. Version 2 has too much information which can be confusing to the customer. Few of my suggestions for Version 1 would be
1. Bold/highlight the things that are most important or the Key Elements
2. Focus on the return or benefit the customer would have

1 week ago

It is hard to choose, version 1 is more pleasing graphically and all the elements concentrate around the Saiterm logo, while Version 2 presents the data in a more understandable manner. If the infographics are to be successful they should clearly lead the reader through the presented data, the arrows on the top are a good idea but you could also introduce some pointers in the body of the graphics, or at least draw the eye to the section where you want people to start reading because right now I don't know what is the most important information and my sight keeps jumping from one section to another.
Maybe arrows arranged in a circular manner around the logo would work better?

1 week ago

I liked version 2, because it leaves the information a bit more detailed and does not so much embarrass the mind!

1 week ago

Darrick Merrill

I'm the best!

I like version 2 more as it gives a bit more information to how the ecosystem operates. As a heating contractor what I really want to know is how I can get a SPRING system to install and test. I have a 4000 square foot shop that I would really like to heat using infa-red radiant heat instead of the ducted gas furnace. Infa-red red would give much more effective comfort rather than transferring heat to air and trying to heat by convection SPRING would warm all the surfaces in the building and I guess earn me some SIAEX while at it.

1 week ago

Nuno Caeiro

I’m software developer/team leader for 15+ years

I like version 1, because I think it’s much customer centric and easy to understand. Gives a better overview of what Saiterm is.

1 week ago

Fred Blauer

Open for business

I would say version 1. I think that it is a little clearer.

1 week ago

For non-English speakers, the first version is more understandable.

1 week ago

1

1 week ago

Very good is number 2
Very completed

1 week ago

Remove small human shadow figures as they are not bringing any added value to the picture which is already full of elements and is kind of hard to see the message.

2 weeks ago

Diovanne Sagosoy

A SIMPLE TRADER

that was stands for the users or trader either..

2 weeks ago

Diovanne Sagosoy

A SIMPLE TRADER

i will choose version 2 much more interactive and with more different choices to choose according to your strategy

2 weeks ago

I would choose version 2 as you can find out more information in it!
Version 1 is also good in its order and prostate - and if the first version is combined with the second, it would be great at all!
Example: you go to the project and you are given the opportunity to choose which version you would like to stay on. it can also be changed all of a sudden!

2 weeks ago

I think version 1 is more clear and easy to use,
If you can make everything simble just do it.

2 weeks ago

Al Wallace

Food blogger with a diverse interest in investment/ crypto

I agree with some of the other comments, the first one is much easier to digest. Although the 2nd has more information, in my opinion, when you have an info graphic like this it needs to be able to be taken in in a few seconds and i found that, despite having read your white paper, the second took me a minute or two to understand. What i did like initially about the second graphic was the additional bullet points above the arrow so perhaps you could look at possibly adding that into the first graphic to include the 'ÍCO' and 'more products.

2 weeks ago

Version 1 sounds more clear and easy to get the what needs to be understood.
I prefer to keep it as simple as possible.

2 weeks ago

Version 1 is a cleaner graphic, just from a visual perspective. Version 2 has more information but takes longer to digest. I would vote for Version 1 for your primary infographic as it is easier to understand quickly.

2 weeks ago

ok

2 weeks ago

I wouldn't use either. If your goal is accetance, the people who are your target don't care about any of this. They want convenience that they don't have to think about. They just want it to work, all the time, without tech support.

2 weeks ago

good

2 weeks ago

Before deciding on this, I'd want to know what the purpose of the chart is.

Easy to guess that you want to show the structure of Saiterm. But to who?

People to talk about crypto all day will go through the details and have ideas on the structure. Investors, consumers, influencers will get lost in #2 (if not both).

Keep it simple and allow that you may have to change and will definitely add to the system.

If you do go with number 2, have graphic artist spruce it up... even consider two slides.

2 weeks ago

Mirror Mirage

Crypto Analyst | May the best win!

I prefer the second one, but there is a lot of clutter. It can be optimized a lot.
ICO SAIEX and GET Spring can be combined into single block. Repetition of same image ( computer screen should be avoided)
Repetition of Radiant/Spring in the top right is repetitive, it can be consolidated as a single representative image.
Saiterm logo should not be in left corner, it should be in the middle, like in the first version.
The image sizes are all disproportionate. Must be resized to feel like consistent blocks.
Should be able to demonstrate the flow between blocks as arrows or line.
Please drop a message to me, want to share some sample ideas/designs.

2 weeks ago

Rosario Colletti

Power is nothing without control

Thanks for your feedback! We updated and created a 3d version, please check it out and let us know :)

1 week ago

Mirror Mirage

Crypto Analyst | May the best win!

In Option #3
a) Donations for spring can be in one line, there is ample space. no need to wrap
b) Treecoinswap plant tree can be in one line. no need of wrap
c) SAIEX Mining (the mobile phone/device icon) juts out . Is there a way to make the left (ico,sto,equity), the middle (spring) and the right (spring maxi radiant) all of equal sizes. it will have more symmetry
d) personally, i think there is no need for the graph and wifi icons above the device,

1 week ago

Hide sub-replies

Remove small human shadow figures as they are not bringing any added value to the picture which is already full of elements and is kind of hard to see the message.

2 weeks ago

Rosario Colletti

Power is nothing without control

Thanks for your feedback! We updated the task and created a 3d version, please check it out and let us know :)

1 week ago

My preference would be second .Why ?

Considering the maturation process of the project, the second version is very suitable.
Many projects in the current market aim to be listed on a stock exchange without doing so.

In particular, the transition to mining after the ICO process is important.
At this stage, the maturity of the project is considered the easiest after being adopted by everyone.

2 weeks ago

Dean Walsh

Don't listen to me because of who I am, I'm nobody like everone else.

I like the first one better because it is clearer and easier to read with less effort, but I would suggest adding the 'more products' part from the second one to show that there are other things planned and development doesn't stop at exchange listing.

2 weeks ago

I believe that the first version looks more convenient .. Though less detailed! The thing is that the eye perceives information in two lines faster !! Perhaps it is worth trying to reduce the image and increase the length of the object !?

2 weeks ago

My suggestions is version 1, if i choic version 2, i say no, Because much a dump, the SAIEX price will be down, and that could never running such while open this project.

2 weeks ago

I like the first version more. User friendly. The important thing is the easiest use. That's why my choice is 1st version.

2 weeks ago

Version 2 is more readable and acceptable. Second version a better explains steps of Saitern project and benefits. Maybe you need to put some dates in graphics (ico, spring production, exchanges).

2 weeks ago

version 1 is looking good for me because in the infographic you only need the main point of your project vision. and if the reader needs a deep explanation about that they can find on the whitepaper.

2 weeks ago

I will go for the first version because of its simplicity. I do not like the idea of starting to look for one icon or another, that slows the work and it efficient.

2 weeks ago

I like Version 1 better. It is much simpler and easier to understand with less steps. I'm a beginner so maybe that's why the second version is too complex for me to wrap my head around.

2 weeks ago

Jaimie Watts

Like to get to the point and find what's real, not what's hype or glittery

I prefer the first one because it is less cluttered and easier to understand. In the 2nd one, why are Spring and Radiant blocks chunked together like that? I don't understand that. There appears to be a circular progression in both, but in the 2nd one it appears to be broken up, or in two circles? The first is much more straightforward in this regard. And it is more holistic and unifying to have the logo in the center instead of as a small piece of another graphic in the lower left. The first version looks professional and comprehensible, the 2nd looks like it wasn't quite finished as far as graphic design goes. One problem I have with both is neither connects the linear orientation of the bar with the circular orientations of the items below.

2 weeks ago

If i would choose one of them i definetely would go with the second one. First of all using the STO would bring your project a trust. Also as far i see that you planing to use Saiex mining options and it is something very good for your project. I always support late exchange option to avoid the price crushing, lots of project has lost because of early exchange situation. So you choose the right thing, same as my thought.

2 weeks ago

NARUTO RAPHEAL

I am a Mechanical Engineer with expertise in power and Mecha-tronics. An Enterpr

i prefer the second version because it spaces out the different info-graphics clearly and thus reduce the ambiguity of what it is trying to say, just want to add that since it is going to be talking about e-currency more symbols that represent this should be used also.

2 weeks ago

Carlos Arana

Time is money

I would prefer the second version, but I would recommend to use a theoretical starting point for the newbie and arrows to help visualize. Also increasing the font could help that version. The top menu appears more complete.

2 weeks ago

When there are more products after exchange listing it will give more confident to the products and it will be more attractive to more exchange which will increase liquidity and price increase, so option 2 is what I will recommend. Thanks

2 weeks ago

If i would choose one of them i definetely would go with the second one. First of all using the STO would bring your project a trust. Also as far i see that you planing to use Saiex mining options and it is something very good for your project. I always support late exchange option to avoid the price crushing, lots of project has lost because of early exchange situation. So you choose the right thing, same as my thought.

2 weeks ago

This had to be the most valuable piece of information I received from this article: " Even though points modify each of the time, consider adding an updated url to old articles or blog posts. If website visitors discover previous posts initially with outdated information and facts, they are able to find the existing version effortlessly as a result of your applied website link."

When I put in articles and some of my posts end up getting older, they may still be relevant to the current market. In addition to that, if the information may need some new content, which I put in a new post, then I am able to do so by adding a link to the newer content. I appreciate that tip. Thanks.

Here in Atlanta, we appreciate it: https://www.mynotronsetup.com
https://notronsupport.com
https://askmcafee.com/activate

1 week ago

If i compare to both version i will prefer first one. First version is more clear to understand and majority viewer can get it quite easily, which is very important for any project. I reckon still in first version has some work to do for become more better project.

2 weeks ago

Ramy Net

Having more than 5 years of crypto experience!

In my opinion, the second version is better, because it is more detailed and explaining clearly the project technology. It would be better to increase a bit the numerical data as well, and to add some QR codes on graphics.

2 weeks ago

If we need to choose one of these two i prefer the firs one. I like the idea of putting QR codes on graphics. I would suggest putting QR codes each graphics which forward people more clear detailed instructions. Main graphics must be very simple so %99 of the people can understand how they will benefit from your project. You may add some illustrations for expected income for each step.

2 weeks ago

I loved the first version because it is simple and seems effective. You can increase the font size a little more for clear visibility of the diagram.

2 weeks ago

I prefer the first version because its look more simple. I would like to suggest you to make bigger letters and diagrams.

2 weeks ago

I'd prefer the second version. Lectures are more detailed and more informative. I would also increase numerical data a little more

2 weeks ago

I prefer the second version. My selection is based on my own interpretation of the diagram. I would suggest a "key" is added to throw more light and make it easier for all to have similar understanding.

2 weeks ago

Rosario Colletti

Power is nothing without control

what do you mean by 'key' ?

2 weeks ago

I meant to say key words.

2 weeks ago

Hide sub-replies