Revenue-sharing vs Reward-based crowdfunding
In the turn of the decade new and more exciting ways to attract investors has come about. Likewise to every old-fashioned way of doing things, turned upside down by Millenials, the way we invested isn't the same. It's way easier than before to get investors and funding for your startup or project idea. In comparison to how it was just two decades ago, where you had to pitch to a group of maybe 10 investors amongst a round table, finding hungry investors is simple and just with a click of a button, the right platform you can get funded for nearly everything. Not only businesses you can get funded for school, your ideas, or passion. The limit of collecting funds from anyone isn't there anymore.
Read also: Equity vs Revenue Crowdfunding
In the midst of this crowd-funding trend came about two different ways of collecting money from investors/backers. In the following paragraphs, we will discuss the differences between the very popular reward-based crowdfunding (e.g. Kickstarter & IndieGoGo) and the new concept of revenue-based crowdfunding (Crowdholding).
1. Reward-based Crowdfunding
Reward-based crowdfunding is a way of collecting funds to fulfill an audience needs or wants with little to no reward. Sometimes companies/inventors will give away a small stake in their companies/project profit to the backers that give away the most. However, most of the time there isn't any reward involved. Often people back a project because of its uniqueness or for the interest in the project. Sometimes the creators will give away a prize or something significant towards the process for donating, but mostly that's all you'll be receiving.
2. Revenue-sharing crowdfunding
Revenue sharing is alike to the original concept of investing. You place forward some funds to help start their project/company and as a reward, you get a return from future sales. Instead of stocks/equity, you will receive a small portion of the company's revenue for a short period of time. Similar to collecting a royalty, but instead of a permanent percentage until a company reaches a goal you will be collecting the company's money no matter if the goal is reached or not. It's very controversial and some companies find it counter-intuitive and evil However, revenue sharing is particularly attractive for businesses with seasonal sales, when you business is good, you pay back more, when sales are slower, payments will go down as well. Revenue sharing make the investment process more simple, as it does not deal with the complexity of equity, as it the investors are not owners of the business.
Let’s look at an example. Company “Bobo’s” is a restaurant that has been doing business for 2 years with 100,000$ in the last 12 months revenue and an average annual growth rate of 5%. The restaurant’s owner believes that the community of customers and supporters that the company has created, represents a potential capital source and many of its customers would be thrilled about helping the business grow. Bobo’s is looking to make some improvements to its restaurant, which will cost 50,000$. The owner of Bobo’s turns to the crowd for raising capital, promising they will be paid back for 5 years or until they multiply the crowd’s investment by 1.25x Amount Invested. This motivates the crowd to play an active role in the restaurant’s activities. They will be directly contributing to the performance of Bobo’s y advocating the brand and continuing their relationship. Bobo’s will benefit from healthier revenue growth and a more engaged customer base.
Which is better?
When comparing revenue-sharing crowdfunding to other methods for raising capital, a business must find the most attractive option for their particular case. Companies need to consider the speed of underwriting, motivation of the investor base, flexibility of payments and no personal guarantees. If all these factors are attractive, then it would logical to use revenue-sharing crowdfunding over reward-based crowdfunding.
There a ton of comparisons I could throw out to try to alter your opinion, however, knowing which is best is based on your position. If you're an investor you would like revenue-sharing more than reward-based crowdfunding, but if you're a company you will like reward-based crowdfunding more. It's very simple logic and it's easy to understand why this is true.
There are thousands upon thousands of alternative ways of gaining capital for your business but revenue-sharing is the newest and upgraded version of crowdfunding. Depending if you're an investor or the CEO of the company, can lead you to the decision of either reward-based or revenue-sharing crowdfunding. To find the right structure for raising capital, the business needs to have a strong understanding of the business performance. Nevertheless, both ways of crowdsourcing funds are spectacular and will stick around for years to come as long as there are platforms for it.
You may also be interested in:
And also remember, best of luck with your business!
CrowdholdingCrowdholding connects the crowd with entrepreneurs, allowing you to give feedback and ideas for a future share.
First æternity Aepp Joins Crowdholding: Welcoming CryptoTask
Crowdholding Partner’s with Aeternity Ventures to support Starfleet Acceleration Program
Crowdholding May Update
Top 5 reasons to get YUPs! (Get dividends for holding YUPs)
Crowdholding April Update
Implementing Crowdholding widget to your website
ITF excelled with Crowd Wisdom
TailoredInk ICO Community Management
IronX ICO Social Media Marketing
Aerum ICO Influencer Marketing
Jarvis built with the crowd
ySign engaged the blockchain crowd
6 Ways to Earn Crypto For Free
Common Mistakes When Investing in ICOs
Connectjob joins Crowdholding
Week in a Nutshell & Smart Contract
Opporty joins Crowdholding
Getting to Know our Users
SmartCash joins Crowdholding
Bitcoen.io joins Crowdholding
What is a Smart Contract?
How to Create an ICO - Part 3 - Marketing
How to Create an ICO - Part 2 - The Two "W's"
How to create an ICO - Part 1 - The building blocks
Invest Time, Not Money
What alternatives are there to financing your business?
What is an ICO? And should you invest?
Blockchain technology : changing the world of business silently
Crowdholding’s Pre-Sale — A Case Study
How to become a Crowdholding supporter: Part 3 exchanging ETH for YUPIES
China ban on ICO’s : Not all Doom and Gloom?
How to become a Crowdholding supporter: Part 2 Buy some Ether (ETH) on Coinbase
How to create a task on Crowdholding
How to become a Crowdholding supporter: Part 1 creating a Ethereum wallet on MyEtherWallet.com
How to create a project on Crowdholding
Cryptocurrencies and their value
What is Crowdholding?
What is a White Paper? And do you need one?
What can CEO’s / Entrepreneurs learn from athletes?
How to start my own business? Part 3. Validating Your Business Idea
Top 10 career mistakes to avoid
6 Benefits of a Sharing Economy
How to start my own business? Part 2. Factory for ideas
Startup Promotion and Content Marketing Strategy
How to start my own business? Part 1. Five simple rules
The Year Capitalism could have Changed
Robots & Work: Jack Ma Predicted The Emergence of Robot-CEO
Startup Psychology: Why Entrepreneurs will save the planet?
Billionaire's School: it's hard to be the first
10 interesting sport startups that will rule 2017
30 reasons to be an online entrepreneur
How to chose a dating site?
You should know this striking marketing trend
10 reasons to join Crowdholding if you are a student
How did 67,000 people create the first crowdsourced melody?
Launch a startup with a partner, never alone.
Collaboration solves education problems with flying colors!
Hollywood movie from your smartphone?
Design your room the way you want it!
Hi, You're Hired!
Hi, Your business is now a unicorn!
Don't want to change the world for the better? You can stop reading now.
Sharing Economy is not a niche, it's the future
📊 What if karma was 🆚 worth something? 🤜🤛
Raise capital, preserve equity
5 marketing strategies for successful contact with Millennials
Why 75% of new products are doomed to fail?
Small Business Staffing Opportunities
What are Crowd Currencies?
Mass Collaboration leads to unprecedented innovation
Alternative Finance: Equity vs Crowdshare Crowdfunding
Co-creation between the crowd and small businesses
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IT AND CO CREATION
Corruption on Wall Street: The Stolen American Dream
To own or to rent, trends in sharing economics
CROWDSOURCING IN FASHION
Crowdsourcing a girlfriend
CrowdSourcing Trends 2020
Peer-to-peer journalism: What and how?
The Peer-To-Peer Marketplace Revolution
Peer-to-peer in the fashion industry
The relationship between Co-creation and Innovation
CROWDFUNDING AND VIDEOGAMES
NON-EQUITY CROWDFUNDING CHANGING FASHION BUSINESS
Revenue-sharing vs Reward-based crowdfunding
Blockchain application in Media industry
Blockchain Technology & Crowdfunding
Creative marketing through Crowdsourced Content
JOBS OF THE FUTURE
Alternative finance for small businesses
WHY CO-CREATE? – A message to the Crowd
Think Tanks and Benefits
Empowering Global Citizens to Improve Education
THE EVIL WALL STREET
Co-creation in Tech
WHY CO-CREATE? - Benefits for Small Businesses
Co-creation and Innovation
Co-creation in the Fashion Industry
Crowdholding vs Wallstreet
Make a brand your brand
Reward Distribution Rules.
Please read below how the rewarding structure works.
Voters get 35% of the reward
Commenters still receive the majority of 65% of the reward weight, while voters 35%.
You receive only 7 upvotes and must vote what you think are the best answers
You now have a limited amount of upvotes. You won’t see the other user votes until the task expires. If you vote the top half comments you will receive a portion of the 35%.
Top 50% upvoted comments get bigger share
Our algorithm gives top 50% upvoted comments more rewards than the bottom 50% comments.
Give me an example with numbers
Upvoters get 35 % of the reward.
65 % goes to the commentors.
Half of the reward is gained from bottom 1/2.
Upvoters get nothing
1/2 of the reward pool for this segmentis distributed among top 1/2
There is a task with 1000 Reward.
Let’s assume Top 1/2 recevies 70% of all upvotes.
Bottom gets 30 %. But because half of the reward goes to Top 1/2 that makes the final numbers more like Top 1/2 gets 85% (55.25% for commentors, 29,75% for upvoters) and bottom gets 15 % of the final reward.
If there’s 100 upvotes:
1 upvote that upvotes a comment in Top is worth around 12 Yups (circa 8 goes to commentor, 4 goes to upvoter)
1 upvote that upvotes a comment in Bottom is worth 5 (All goes to commentor).
Reminder about our Moderation
If you upvote a comment that’s reported as Spam or comment that should not be rewarded (eg. “Good job” comments) you will lose your right to be rewarded for this task.
We hope you like this new system and it brings you lots of fruitful discussions and reward you fairly.
Do you still have questions? Read more detailed explanation at our helpdesk
All the best,
Your Crowdholding Team